Critically Evaluate Project Plan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Critically Evaluate Project Plan - Essay Example The main difference between leadership and management is how they motivate people as managers motivate their subordinates through communicating while leaders persuade their followers to remain committed to the shared vision (Northouse 2010). The managers react to changes in the built environment while leaders create change. Accordingly, managers exercise their control and power while leaders develop power within their people (Alizor 2011). The managers will try to maintain status quo through organizing and directing project tasks while leaders set new directions and perspectives that challenge the existing status quo in housing projects (Lussier and Achua 2010). Autocratic leadership style involves making decisions without consulting the subordinates and project managers often use this leadership style in emergency situations. Autocratic leadership may lead to team hostility and high dependence on the leader thus it is ineffective in the delegation of tasks (Burke and Barron 2014). Harrell (2008) outlines that the approach requires close supervision, but it is appropriate in making faster decisions. Transactional leadership style will involve the use of formal job descriptions, authority and formal job output expectations to implement a dwelling project. The approach to leadership leads to less job satisfaction. Laissez-faire leadership style is a hands-off approach to leadership whereby the leader provides the required resources and tools for the successful completion of the dwelling project (Lussier and Achua 2010). The subordinates are free to make their own decisions and it is effective when the subordinates are highly experienced and mo tivated. The approach is not ideal where the team members have not prior experience in executing successful dwelling projects.

Territorial Expansion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Territorial Expansion - Essay Example The independent state of Texas had planned its fate from a long time that it would be annexed with the US, despite Mexican’s continual threads to stop this political thinking by the use of force. Congress approved the annexation of Texas on February 28, 1845. In 1937, an early time in the US history, White House made attempts to annex Taxis within the US domain. As soon as this news gained some momentum, rationalist groups started to protest against it. Down with strong frustrated resistance to adding slave states as a part of the United States. In a matter of time the socialist and political thinking went in the favor of Texas as soon as James Polk won the elections of 1844 in Texas. And finally, on Dec 29, 1845 Texas was annexed as a part of US territory. The growing conflicts between the US and Mexico led to a war between the two. There was no way for Mexico win over the US, and it lost wretchedly. Once the US occupied Texas, they opened it for the US civilians. What were t he short-term consequences of the acquisition of this particular territory? The immediate consequence of annexation of Texas was that as soon as Texas gained the authority of a state, Mexico cancelled all the diplomatic relationships with the US. The United States always claimed that the border of Texas was stretched all the way from Rio de Genera’ do, quoting the 1836 Treaties of Velasco. ... The primary battles of the combat were fought in Texas in which US was victorious. After these crucial victories, the United States marched into Mexican territory, finishing the clash in Texas. After the annexation, Stephen Austin took control and under his commands the Texas community flourished. He insisted the American immigrants to abide the law. In a short time of a decade, Texas population increased by 1500 inhabitants. Some of the immigrants were traitors, with a variety of legal complexity. It was not astonishing that the Mexican administration ultimately came to believe the Texans’, as they were named at the time, â€Å"a crowd of infamous crooks,† even though the majority was well-mannered natives. Texas was incredibly of a safe haven for the US citizens who had motive to leave house. One of the initially hard tasks for the Texans’ was that they lacked resources. But still they were always willing to fight with Mexico. Following a few concise combats, M exican ruler Santa Anna individually led a militia of several thousand fine skilled troops into Texas to put down the revolution. The Texas armed forces, which never figured further than 800, had slight experience in war. Therefore, they experienced an intimidating task. The analysis at that time of some 300 Texans’ employees, set as capitalists, executives, laborers, and wide-ranging service workers, disclose that the consequential work strength included, Americans, Europeans, and Indians. This combination went unsuccessful to even out this isolated area, which was deficient in formal, communal, political, and financial association. Texas rustlers caused anarchy. Deprived supervision ended in overstocking, and lack of care commenced critical diseases. But these